• eleitl@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    AltaVista’s advanced search (e.g. the NEAR statement) was extremely effective. Google was never as good even in its best days, nevermind now.

    • noahm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s overstating it. There’s a reason Google took over: it was better pretty much all around. The original Google algorithm was a really amazing tool for finding quality content on the web as it existed in those days. That was before SEO drove all these focused efforts on gaming the system.

      With that said, Alta Vista definitely was the most promising tool before Google, and it had some potential if it hadn’t been so poorly managed by DEC. They simply saw it as a cool demo for their Alpha server platform, and never had any vision for it as a meaningful product on its own.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        Sure, but it was the best tool for science/technology searches, in the hand of an expert user. I’m still salty all subsequent search engines were inferior in that respect.