• jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    The idea of a national culture having some claim on a food type is novel? I’d say the concept is pretty common and widespread.

    • Baŝto@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Novel and widespread have nothing to do with aech other.

      From the wikipedia article about nations:

      The broad consensus amongst scholars of nationalism is that nations are a recent phenomenon. However, some historians argue that their existence can be traced to the medieval period, or a minority believe even to antiquity.

    • Akasazh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Yes it’s quite novel. Most national identities and stereotypes are from the latter half of the nineteenth century. Read Eric Hobsbawns ‘the invention of tradition’’ for example.

      The Italian cuisine and it’s staples are very much a construction from the post war period, look at the history of the spaghetti carbonara, which was wiped up by an American army cook, but was later elevated to an supposedly ‘ancient’ recipe.

      But before the era of nationalism most people didn’t think in terms of nations and national stereotypes.

      • jaybone@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Ok “nationalism” sure. But you can’t argue that cultural associations didn’t exist. This is why we had trade routes. And agriculture influenced by regional geography, climate, etc.

        You point out very carefully selected specific examples like carbonara. This is like the exception that proves the rule.