Forester@pawb.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agoA cow is more likely to kill you than a sharkpawb.socialimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1259arrow-down135file-text
arrow-up1224arrow-down1imageA cow is more likely to kill you than a sharkpawb.socialForester@pawb.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 14 hours agomessage-square67fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agoso… hydroelectric power stations collapsed, thus renewable energies like wind turbines and solar power are bad?
minus-squareForester@pawb.socialOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down3·3 hours agoIf nuclear is too scary because it killed ~5k why is hydro considered safe when it has a kill count 100X higher?
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 hours agothat’s not the question here. Why are you throwing unrelated things in with hydro?
minus-squareForester@pawb.socialOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-23 hours agoAh yes the unrelated renewable sources that doesn’t make up 1/2 of all renewables production. https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy
minus-squareSkullgrid@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours agoyour post wasn’t about percentage of generation, it was about quantity of deaths
so… hydroelectric power stations collapsed, thus renewable energies like wind turbines and solar power are bad?
If nuclear is too scary because it killed ~5k why is hydro considered safe when it has a kill count 100X higher?
that’s not the question here. Why are you throwing unrelated things in with hydro?
Ah yes the unrelated renewable sources that doesn’t make up 1/2 of all renewables production.
https://ourworldindata.org/renewable-energy
your post wasn’t about percentage of generation, it was about quantity of deaths