• SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Funny thing, flattening the entire city is what did happen in the 20th century. But for cars.

    Bad transit and big parking lots are a policy choice, and many cities around the world are showing that we can still make better choices. We don’t just have to put up with car shit.

    • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      A lot of place around the world aren’t as large as the US either. It’s not as simple as ‘fuckcars’ would make you believe.

      • SwingingTheLamp@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        If the U.S. is so large, then don’t we have plenty of room to build the necessities of life (stores, schools, offices) near where people live? The size of the country has next to nothing to do with the layout of a city. That’s absurd.

        • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          You could think that, but the only reason historical cities built tight and dense was 1. lack of transportation and 2. lack of space. Since the US is much younger with neither of those issues, you see people spread out. It’s why the American ‘dream’ is home and land. But that means to get places you need transportation, and since everything is so spread out, it would be next to impossible fiscally to have adequate and speedy public transportation.