• bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    His quote from the article:

    “[…] I need to come to terms with the fact that the level of dopamine I’ve been getting from interacting with LLMs…with doing more and more and more and more…is not healthy for me or good for the world. It is careless, and has disconnected me from where people are on this.

    I was talking about this with [my wife] Katherine last night and she did not pull any punches. Frankly, neither did [my brother] John. Neither of them think I’ve been being healthy. I need to readjust.”

    Not really knowing the drama before today, it seems like he is being very rational and speaking honestly about the effects LLMs are having on his behavior and that he identified he needs to change, which is what the whole article is about.

    • XLE@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The article (Hank Green understanding himself) and the comment I was responding to (Hank Green misleading people about AI) are two similar different topics that can and should be judged separately.

      I was responding to the person who said he was generally trustworthy about the topic in general, with what I think is a significant counterexample.

      • Sidyctism II.@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Ohh jesus, that video (the one with nate soares) was actually the first hank green video i watched (wasnt aware of either them at the time). Though what i remember from my reaction i was mainly pissed off that the video is called “chatgpt isnt smart. Its something much weirder” and than basically doesnt discuss matters of intelligence or similiarities/ differences between human intellect and machine “intellect” at all. Instead we got this worthless moneyquote “this is alchemy” from soares, which even made it onto the thumbnail.

      • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess it’s up to the reader to determine if the linked article from a few days ago of Hank reflecting bullish attitude should be judged separately from the articles and videos months ago about his behavior he has since identified as problematic. Maybe he used to be a piece of shit, not anymore? People can change.

        • XLE@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I don’t associate these two different events as evidence of a shift in personal stances, because they can both be things he believes at the same time. That also means that hopefully people can empathize with him even while disagreeing with his stances about some things.

          (If his stance did change, that would be great and I wouldn’t want to deny it, but his video promoting AI lobbyists is still unfortunately up.)