• T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    That’s a bad idea. You don’t want to get a stranger, or yourself in the eye.

    Anything that would do meaningful damage to a camera sensor will easily do that to human eyeballs if it refracts or gets reflected.

    Especially for cheaper high-power lasers, which may not properly filter out invisible wavelengths like IR.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Anything that would do meaningful damage to a camera sensor will easily to that to human eyeballs if it refracts or gets reflected.

      I don’t think that’s true? The lidars on Waymo have been known to damage camera sensors but are safe to the eyes. By damage, like a pixel or two go out, but that’s from a random hit. If you did it right you could do more damage.

      • T156@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Interesting. I would have expected cameras to be more resilient between both their internal filters and the sensor material being tougher than human eyeballs, so anything that could overwhelm that and burn out a camera sensor would be able to ruin someone’s vision almost instantly.