Companies must ensure people know when they are interacting with artificially generated images, audio and text designed to look real

  • 712@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    EU is bi-polar. Making some of the best regulations (GDPR, AI Act…) and then suddenly fucking people over with stuff like Chat Control.

    • TheOctonaut@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      The EU is a collection of different states with different values and priorities, any of which can propose legislation or recommendations. Many of the states and parties disagree with each other on diverse issues.

      Y’know, like a democracy.

      Chat control is a divisive idea and one that has never had majority support.

      This isn’t America where the gob-king just says “tarifs are 200% now!!” and people act like it’s true.

      • 712@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Chat control never had majority support, indeed. Still, Chat Control Light is in effect right now. Not making the EU looks very democratic.

    • amarynthia@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Chat control was US big techs baby. They wanted to keep scanning peoples messages but GDPR messes with that so they’ve been trying to get Brussels to give them an exception forever. The “CSAM” angle is just plausible deniability