• Zos_Kia@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I think there’s a categorical issue in how this whole story is framed, at least for the examples that have been cited by the booksellers themselves. These books are “rare” because they are low-print and have basically no demand, think obsolete technical books from the 60s or university theses printed at 100 copies. This kind of books are routinely destroyed by booksellers, and even publishers, because keeping inventory is expensive and nobody is buying or reading them. That’s how AI companies are able to buy them for pennies on the dollar, and whatever they don’t buy is probably eligible for recycling or burning by the seller/publisher anyway.

    It’s basically a way to slurp up a few billion tokens for cheap. They’re destroying the copies by chopping off the spine and feeding the loose pages into page-fed scanners, which is way less expensive than those non-destructive scanning robots, but this doesn’t work on really old books from previous centuries as the paper is different and fragile and will jam your scanner constantly.

    What they’re looking for is industrially-produced books with low circulation, not because they are culturally valuable but because they contain prose that hasn’t yet been digitized and that’s what they need for pre-training.