• percent@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    …this assumes that no one will ever connect LLMs to machinery, or generate code to run machinery (gcode, for example)?

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Physical systems are a lot more expensive to train. It’s questionable if they can safely finish buildings before some better new form of AI is invented.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Also to some extent, impossible to train. If a person needs to feel the situation or it demands the full dexterity of the hand, then that is not going to be captured in training data. It’s why the robots are being tele-operated, yes in part to demonstrate the mechanical bits work, but the tele-operation is the only way they can get training data. If you couldn’t use a VR controller to do a task successfully, then they can’t even capture the training data needed.