It’s impossible to competently read those screenshots and come away with the idea that, say, kittenz is “denying genocide” re: Pinochet. The others are similarly ridiculous, they just don’t mean thst at all.
Instead of gesturing to a post with like 10 screenshots of text, why not quote kittenz and say what you think is genocide denial.
For example we objectively know that most of the claims against Stalin were falsified. Not to say he was perfect but even the CIA admits they falsefied it.
Literally nothing about genocide.
Salvador Allende was a great democratic socialist who supposedly did everything right and look what happened to him
Literally nothing about genocide and you seem to completely misunderstand kittenz orientation to Allende.
[Captain AmericaCX image captioned with “No, I don’t think I will.”]
Obviously a reply to someone telling them to stop talking.
So you have nothing. I think you should take some time to ask why you are so confident even though it really seems that you are having difficulty reading and understanding what’s in front of you. I don’t mean the latter as an insult, it is perfectly fine to not immediately understand something. The issue is that you act very certain about a topic where you are actually uncertain.
For example we objectively know that most of the claims against Stalin were falsified. Not to say he was perfect but even the CIA admits they falsefied it.
What supposed genocides are they being an apologist of here?
Apologia B: Salvador Allende was a great democratic socialist who supposedly did everything right and look what happened to him Apologia
What? Salvador Allende is not Pinochet, and Pinochet was opposed to him. You do know that Pinochet was the one to overthrow Allende, right?
How can this even be interpreted as support for Pinochet?
Apologia C: [President Biden image captioned with “No, I don’t think I will.”]
That’s not even Biden, nor is there any genocide apologia going on there.
It’s impossible to competently read those screenshots and come away with the idea that, say, kittenz is “denying genocide” re: Pinochet. The others are similarly ridiculous, they just don’t mean thst at all.
Instead of gesturing to a post with like 10 screenshots of text, why not quote kittenz and say what you think is genocide denial.
Removed by mod
Literally nothing about genocide.
Literally nothing about genocide and you seem to completely misunderstand kittenz orientation to Allende.
Obviously a reply to someone telling them to stop talking.
So you have nothing. I think you should take some time to ask why you are so confident even though it really seems that you are having difficulty reading and understanding what’s in front of you. I don’t mean the latter as an insult, it is perfectly fine to not immediately understand something. The issue is that you act very certain about a topic where you are actually uncertain.
What supposed genocides are they being an apologist of here?
What? Salvador Allende is not Pinochet, and Pinochet was opposed to him. You do know that Pinochet was the one to overthrow Allende, right?
How can this even be interpreted as support for Pinochet?
That’s not even Biden, nor is there any genocide apologia going on there.
That’s not biden. That’s captain america.
Removed by mod
You haven’t listed a single genocide denial. None of these are genocide denial.
Are you doing a bit? A joke?
Where is the denial?
At this point you should just admit that none of what you asserted was going on.