There are valid reasons to use an MIT license. Why do you care how someone else licenses their own code?
Write your own code and license it how you prefer.
GPL was designed as a virus to end the existence or viability of copyright law. I do appreciate the idea, and plenty of my code is licensed as GPL or comparable copyleft license. Also, plenty of my code is licensed under more permissive licenses, as that is sometimes more appropriate for that code to be useful.
Do I care someone makes money out of code originating from what I wrote? I do not. Do I care whether they give me their modifications to such code? I do not.
No reason to hate on MIT license. It has its uses.
MIT makes sense in a Capitalist world where corpos want all the advantages of FOSS without having to give up the massive amounts of money generated and protected by IP laws.
Copyleft licensing scares them away, and anything that scares mega-corps away is probably good.
Don’t get me wrong, MIT is still better than proprietary licensing, but not as good as strong Copyleft licensing like the GPL.
There are valid reasons to use an MIT license. Why do you care how someone else licenses their own code? Write your own code and license it how you prefer.
GPL was designed as a virus to end the existence or viability of copyright law. I do appreciate the idea, and plenty of my code is licensed as GPL or comparable copyleft license. Also, plenty of my code is licensed under more permissive licenses, as that is sometimes more appropriate for that code to be useful.
Do I care someone makes money out of code originating from what I wrote? I do not. Do I care whether they give me their modifications to such code? I do not.
No reason to hate on MIT license. It has its uses.
MIT makes sense in a Capitalist world where corpos want all the advantages of FOSS without having to give up the massive amounts of money generated and protected by IP laws.
Copyleft licensing scares them away, and anything that scares mega-corps away is probably good.
Don’t get me wrong, MIT is still better than proprietary licensing, but not as good as strong Copyleft licensing like the GPL.
There are occasions in which you do want your software to be easily adopted by large corporations.
Of course, that’s what I said; in this Capitalist world, sometimes you have to compromise and choose a worse license in order to support FOSS.