• ElectricVocalist@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Congrats you made a mistake. Any contributor can make commits with ai bots credited into them, and it’s not displayed to the reviewer. Meaning that for just accepting a MR that looked good, you would get banned. Nothing is obvious

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The rule is for vibe coded projects. From the article:

      If your work fits into these cases, it is unlikely that you are affected at all:

      • Projects who have an active community that cares about and maintains the software
      • Projects with a significant pre-LLM history
      • Maintainers who unknowingly or willingly accepted LLM-generated contributions from other contributors, if your project otherwise does not involve the heavy use of LLMs

      They don’t need a rule that can be run automatically because it’s a purely human operation that is trying to take a stand against the more pernicious effects of corporate LLMs.

      Do you just disagree with this stance and are just trying to poke whatever hypothetical holes you can in their logic, or do you just want more rigorous definitions/rules?

      From experience, content moderation works best when there is some flexibility in the rules, so people can talk it out and come to concessions together.

      • ElectricVocalist@jlai.lu
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        The child is the person who acts before thinking and without caring about the issues it will cause