vogi@piefed.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-25 hours agothe trojan fanmedia.piefed.socialimagemessage-square73fedilinkarrow-up1406arrow-down11
arrow-up1405arrow-down1imagethe trojan fanmedia.piefed.socialvogi@piefed.social to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · edit-25 hours agomessage-square73fedilink
minus-squarehOrni@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·edit-24 hours agoA traditional fan also pulls air from around its blades using the same principal. A bladeless is just a gimmick it has no actual benefits. Here’s a video on the subject: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySSo5PmZZJM It turns out, a bladeless fan is even less efficient than a traditional one. It works better, when you remove the casing.
minus-squareAxolotl@feddit.itlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down5·3 hours ago it has no actual benefits. no toddler will put their hands in to it can look better for some people
minus-squareValmond@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 hours agoToddler hands don’t go through the protection of a classic fan, if it’s built like after 1965. Also we were not discussing esthetics but efficiency.
A traditional fan also pulls air from around its blades using the same principal. A bladeless is just a gimmick it has no actual benefits.
Here’s a video on the subject:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySSo5PmZZJM
It turns out, a bladeless fan is even less efficient than a traditional one. It works better, when you remove the casing.
Toddler hands don’t go through the protection of a classic fan, if it’s built like after 1965.
Also we were not discussing esthetics but efficiency.