• Ebby@lemmy.ssba.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    No specialist or anything, but I imagine most of the kaboom potential is puncture-based. I don’t expect much to make it to the heart of a train as trains generally win in collisions.

    Pressure vessel fatigue is possible too, but generally rated and tested well above pressure relief valves.

    • frongt@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends on how you define “win”. It only takes one small hydrogen leak for a catastrophe. A train will wreck any car or truck for sure, hit or miss with another train, but even a simple derailment of tanker cars often results in a significant mess.

      There are nuclear rail transport containers that have been tested in collisions, and they’ve never leaked, but they’re very big and heavy for not a whole lot of volume. And they’re sealed, while a fuel tank needs holes to let fuel in and out.

      • Dave.@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Luckily hydrogen floats upwards pretty quickly. So paradoxically, storage tanks are safer the less protection they have around them. Or at least, above them.