• kolmaskommentoija@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yes! What is the appeal? Why switch all the time? I just install the OS, tweak everything to work, then let it be. I clearly am not enough of a nerd. My whole Linux adventure started with distros, that were said to be easy for beginners… and I did not move past that, because stuff works?

    • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I’ve hopped around a lot when I first got into Linux (mostly to check out different desktops, see what the fuss is about rolling releases, and trying to get a little more performance). Haven’t done any of that for about 5 years, I’m actually planning on moving from Ubuntu to Debian because of Canonical’s corporate bullshit, but there’s just too much annoying work to do to recreate my setup on a new install.

    • Crozekiel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      To be fair, some of these responses are clearly going back 20+ years and only have 8 total “hops”. In that time a typical windows user would have gone through 7-10 different versions of windows depending on how lucky they got with stuff like ME and 8…

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That seems like a very plausible explanation! I tried mint 16 and didn’t do the jump because it was not up to it just yet. Being a linux nerd 10-20 years ago and the differences were probably huge between distros, and they changed all the time too.

        Smart thinking!