Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

    • fork@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I mean in terms of video containers, webm is a video container made by the same or adjacent team that made webp. The only other video container I’ve seen that supports transparency is HEVC, which only works in safari.

      Transparency is the only reason I’d ever use webm, just to clarify.

      • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        If we’re talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

        Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

        Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it’s a codec.

        • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          58 minutes ago

          As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

          So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.