Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

  • fork@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I mean in terms of video containers, webm is a video container made by the same or adjacent team that made webp. The only other video container I’ve seen that supports transparency is HEVC, which only works in safari.

    Transparency is the only reason I’d ever use webm, just to clarify.

    • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      If we’re talking in terms of vodeo containers (or codecs), then why are we talking about it on a post about webp?

      Unless you consider webp to be a video container because it does support animated pictures, but, again, it also supports transparency.

      Also, HEVC is not a video (/media) container, it’s a codec.

      • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        57 minutes ago

        As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

        So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.