• eicker@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    5 hours ago

    1.5 TB of unified memory sounds less like a computer and more like Apple preparing for the moment your local AI starts asking for a raise. Plot twist: by 2028 the RAM upgrade still costs more than the rest of the machine combined.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Remember this is “unified”, it’s not like you can upgrade, nor is it available in the “cheap” packaging we’re used to.

      You’ll get whatever Apple puts on the SoC, and you’ll be happy with it

      • eicker@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        The upside is that unified memory is genuinely different from traditional RAM. The CPU, GPU and Neural Engine all share the same memory pool, so data doesn’t need to be copied back and forth. That reduces latency, improves efficiency and lets AI models, graphics and other workloads access much larger datasets. It also uses less power and saves board space. The downside is obvious: because it’s integrated into the chip, you have to choose the right amount upfront, since it can’t be upgraded later.

        • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Ya, these high memory amounts and ever increasing memory bandwidth are heavily (but not only) targeting people wanting to run local large AI models like a full deepseek on their machines.

          You might not be able to train as well on them as NVIDIA + CUDA, but for local inference, they’re an alternative to NVIDIA and more reasonably priced for the model sizes you can run, and each iteration they get better as the bandwidth increases.