• mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The dude was using a makeshift mortar to fire at densely populated urban areas even though using mortars where forbidden because the amount of civilians that got murdered was to high even for the us army standards. At the absolute provable minimum he risked children getting killed or injured even after ordered not to do so

    https://imgur.com/a/wY3l0Ki

    https://www.reddit.com/r/CombatFootage/comments/e613vv/iraq_us_marines_in_ramadi_use_an_mk19_grenade/

    • NewDark@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Reading it, it seems more careless and stupid rather than malicious. But, I still didn’t know this before and I appreciate it.

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 minutes ago

        Ok so you get the order from higher ups that shelling this area is forbidden because it is too population dense. You then jerry-rig a kind-of mortar using a grenade launcher in order to explicitly defy this command without getting detected. You note that “it [is]n’t the most accurate system and [have] no idea if you ever killed an enemy mortar crew with it”, but sadly your training was insufficient to know that you would be putting childrens lives and limbs at undue risk?? And your reaction is basically 🤷???

        Here’s a thought experiment: an american community starts to fight back against ICE with armed resistance. One of the ICE agents does the same thing, but years later decides to run as a dem candidate. What (if anything) does he have to do in order for you vote for him?