• solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    One can support a social media age ban (similar to the porn age bans that have existed since forever) while opposing the implementation proposal (invasive age verification needed for nearly everything).

    From what I can tell, the definition of social media in the ban proposals amounts to the presence of algorithmic amplification of clickbait and outrage. It’s not too big a stretch to support banning that altogether, not just for minors. Traditional forums would still be fine, and Lemmy would be fine if it changed a few features that are arguably bad anyway.

    • Blisterexe@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I totally agree with that, I’d argue for either banning the negative aspects or doing that double-blind government-run verification I saw proposed that lets neither the government or the site have relevant information.

      My point was that that stuff is a real concern for most people and that’s why those bills are being passed.