• ryannathans@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Yet Microsoft abandoned the idea because it was so fraught with commercialisation issues. Which is exactly what the experts are saying

    Can’t maintain, can’t upgrade, can’t repair, it pollutes the environment with abandoned shit and it doesn’t scale

    Reliability probably went up because of the extra expense put into making sure it won’t immediately fail and need to be repaired

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I’m not saying the space data centres are a good or even viable idea, just saying you can improve the reliability significantly if you try. The space data centre planis a non starter, there’s nowhere for the heat to go.

      • ryannathans@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Yes, investing in reliability will increase reliability

        You can radiate the heat with a biiiig long radiator but it doesn’t solve any of the other problems or improve commercial scalability

        • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          13 hours ago

          You may note that this thread is talking about data centre reliability …

          Also you can’t radiate heat in space …

            • justaman123@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              34 minutes ago

              Yeah, I’ve been wondering why there’s such a push against the feasibility of space data centers on a lack of cooling when it’s in a vacuum where we have already solved temperature regulations. Are there good arguments for why this doesn’t work for data centers in space? I mean I imagine other concerns will definitely make it difficult but this argument hasn’t seemed accurate to me. I mean also I’m against data centers in general so ya know fuck them but from a reality pov like isn’t that argument incorrect?

            • GreenBeard@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              56 minutes ago

              Hypothetically, a relatively stationary (not doing a lot of accelerating and decelerating) “Space Datacenter” would be a perfect test bed for something like Curie point radiators. Might help with the size of radiator needed to produce the same effect, but that’s probably the least difficult problem with that environment. The radiation shielding you would need would be… well astronomical.

            • Trail@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Sure. What did it cost? How many flights to get it up there? How many human spacewalk missions to maintain it?

          • HugeNerd@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Also you can’t radiate heat in space …

            How does the Sun work?

            • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Mostly emitting ungodly amounts of photons and radiations, as far as the earth is concerned. Is that actually cooling it though ?

              • xthexder@l.sw0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Yes, all that emitted radiation does cool down the sun. It’s why it has a mostly stable temperature instead of getting hotter infinitely.

                • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 minutes ago

                  Oh so youre saying we should convert the heat generated by the data centres to wide spectrum EM and emit that instead? Amazing! There should be no issues with outputting watts or kilowatts of EM from each of these assuredly numerous space data centres.