• CorvusVolvens@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I agree, that this is at the moment not a viable thing and especially the SpaceX “concept” is complete bullshit.

    I do not agree with some of your points, since they are solved/irrelevant (e.g. “regular maintenance”, “low latency”) or could be overcome with reasonable tech advances (e.g. “rockets prohibitively expensive”, “radiation shielding”).

    Let me steelman the argument a bit with this single bit of - sadly forgotten - “super cool and innovative tech”: “Underwater data center”, like project Natick (Microsoft) or the Chinese project:

    https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/chinas-hicloud-launches-wind-powered-underwater-data-center-targets-500mw-subsea-deployment/

    Soooooo, if we will ever see something other than our current land based data centers, we will see millions of ocean data centers, before we will ever see a single commercial space data center.

    Reasons:

    • Delivery is super cheap (in comparison to space) at scale, thanks to the already existing wind farm infrastructure
    • Weight is not an issue
    • Cooling is solved
    • Maintenance is not necessary, but replacement is. Easy on scale, because modular.
    • No radiation shielding necessary
    • Connection: data cable = no extra lag or quantity limit

    Oh, and by the way, it is still not clear if even ocean data center will be viable. Just found this 😂

    https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/spacexs-orbital-data-centers-could-face-same-hurdles-microsofts-abandoned-2026-04-01/