• REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’ll watch these after work, but surely the problem is not availability of water, but drinking water, which is another story? Data centers aim for clean water sources which can be used for drinking. Turf grass don’t need that which makes the comparison seem unfair

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      It just depends on the location.

      Some areas have water shortages where resources are already strained and other areas have abundant water so that no amount of usage will make a dent.

      It not that it isn’t a problem at all, it’s just it is only a problem in specific places and not an inherent issue with datacenters everywhere. Building datacenters in a desert would cause water issues, building them near the great lakes wouldn’t impact water availability in the slightest.

      They do prefer drinking water, because it’s already treated and so the equipment/maintenance to use it is lower and they can just evaporate it away. In other areas, or if required by legislation, they could run coolant to the machines and then cool the coolant using dirtier sources (including seawater).