Yes, these are absolutely things humans struggle to do. And finding more exploits faster is literally better.
Again, you just keep ignoring what I write here and you clearly don’t understand how these tools are actually used. You’re not just having LLM come up with some hypothesis at random here. You use the tool to do the attack. I don’t know why this bit of information is so hard for you to process.
Also, it should be obvious why it’s hard to find correlations in a large set of data than in a small one. Go think about why where’s waldo is hard for humans.
Or not. Maybe for you it would be, but not for a trained researcher.
Maybe you should stop trying to debate a topic you’re very clearly not qualified to have an opinion on. It doesn’t matter if there are intermediate steps which are necessary to make or not. The discussion is about exploits. Either you get unauthorized access or you don’t. Either you have a hole in your system or you don’t.
And as I’ve repeatedly explained to you, and you studiously ignored, finding and exploiting these vulnerabilities is part of the same process. The LLM tests what it does against a live system, and it builds the exploit step by step.
worked in security for a decade. I think I am entitled to my own opinion, even if you don’t like or don’t understand it.
Not only do I understand your opinion, I’ve also spent a lot of time explaining the problems with your claims here.
Also, not sure what the lol here is. What the part you highlighted supports my point which is it’s becoming much easier to find exploits, hence why you see more duplicate reports.
deleted by creator
Yes, these are absolutely things humans struggle to do. And finding more exploits faster is literally better.
Again, you just keep ignoring what I write here and you clearly don’t understand how these tools are actually used. You’re not just having LLM come up with some hypothesis at random here. You use the tool to do the attack. I don’t know why this bit of information is so hard for you to process.
Also, it should be obvious why it’s hard to find correlations in a large set of data than in a small one. Go think about why where’s waldo is hard for humans.
Maybe you should stop trying to debate a topic you’re very clearly not qualified to have an opinion on. It doesn’t matter if there are intermediate steps which are necessary to make or not. The discussion is about exploits. Either you get unauthorized access or you don’t. Either you have a hole in your system or you don’t.
And as I’ve repeatedly explained to you, and you studiously ignored, finding and exploiting these vulnerabilities is part of the same process. The LLM tests what it does against a live system, and it builds the exploit step by step.
Also, here’s what Linus has to say on the subject since you’re just going to ignore anything I say. https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/05/18/linus-torvalds-says-ai-powered-bug-hunters-have-made-linux-security-mailing-list-almost-entirely-unmanageable/5241633
deleted by creator
Not only do I understand your opinion, I’ve also spent a lot of time explaining the problems with your claims here.
Also, not sure what the lol here is. What the part you highlighted supports my point which is it’s becoming much easier to find exploits, hence why you see more duplicate reports.
Cheers.