• boonhet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Also true.

    But if you choose to run software that uses a lot of RAM, ask yourself why you haven’t created an alternative that doesn’t use a lot of RAM. If the answer is “I don’t have the time to”, then that’s probably also why the developer hasn’t made it use less RAM.

    • chilicheeselies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s more likely they are not incentivized to. When you are writing software for a living, typically there days the companies you work for prioritize delivery speed over everything else. If they prioritized memory constraints, software would use less memory.

      When you are rewarded for features and delivery, you end up with shit like electron. Not to even begin talking about how a whole generation of developers learned to code for the web and never touch os level dev…

    • Hund@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The answer to that question is that they’re either lazy, ignorant or both. :D

      In all seriousness. I can imagine that a lot of developers who work on commercial products are given about 20% of the time and resources needed to make a good product. I don’t blame them for doing what it takes to not get fired.

      That’s why libre source software is so important!