• w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Setting up Jellyfin to be accessible outside of my home network has been a huge pain in the ass.

    Not Jellyfin’s fault tho. I wish there was an easier way

    • ranzispa@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Fair, but self hosting stuff has that part of self. It is difficult to make it easy for everyone since everyone has a different setup, as such it is mostly directed towards people who are expert in doing this kinds of things or who will dedicate the time to learn how to do it.

      The good thing is after you spent a couple days trying to figure out how to make it work, it will work in the future and you already know how to setup more stuff.

      • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s not directed towards people who are experts. I’m an expert and can’t secure Jellyfin properly because Jellyfin doesn’t support proper secure authentication.

        • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Which authentication method are you wanting for it? I wouldn’t call myself an expert but my job stuck senior in front of my title a few years back.

          • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            11 hours ago

            I would rather just properly secure it like every other selfhosted service I have, and not have to manage a VPN client for every user who wants to connect to Jellyfin.

            • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 hours ago

              A security focused service vs a media consumption service competing for max security…

              I wonder what would be the most successful at this task…

              • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                11 hours ago

                A security focused authentication service would be the most successful, straightforward, and simple to implement solution.

                Unfortunately Jellyfin, nearly alone amongst its FOSS peers has not implemented support for these services. It’s the only one of my many dozens of selfhosted services that I can’t properly secure.

                • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  11 hours ago

                  There are plugins for SSO.
                  There are 3rd party plugins for OIDC and I think LDAP is even first party.
                  The issue comes when intercepting the signin-progress with 1st party clients. Jellyfin (to my knowledge) doesnt support redirects/callbacks like a homeassistant companion app does.
                  And how many media servers are there? The 2 other major offerings (Plex and Emby) don’t support OIDC either.
                  Plex does it’s own sauce and Emby doesnt support it. Authentik has a guide to implement it via LDAP.

                  And Jellyfin has a tech-debt history being forked from emby. Stark contrast to newly developed projects which were started when SSO and OIDC wasbstarting to become popular.

                  • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    Yeah, natively Jellyfin supports LDAP (1st party plug-in anyway), which means I can use my personal IdP to centrally manage accounts and it works across all their apps I’ve tried (as oppose to the OIDC plugin which seems to still break their apps).

                  • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    10 hours ago

                    Plugins for SSO and OIDC are not a solution as they will only work with the web clients, so that’s a non-starter.

                    Jellyfin can blame it on the tech debt all they want but implementing it really wouldn’t be that hard, they just haven’t prioritized it, simple as.

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I actually love when I run into an issue like that get an error. Researching that stuff is fun for me, but I think trying to get the average person to do it is a non-starter

      • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        Tailscale could probably be easier but I wanted to make it easy for my parents.

        I was trying to set it up via Reverse Proxy in Caddy. My stupid NAS has proprietary software and the only way to do it is in Docker but their version of docker has some wonky issues with ports.

          • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            It’s been a few weeks since I’ve tinkered with it but I plan on pulling it up today. If I remember right, it works fine if I launch it as a singular container by itself, but if I launch it inside a container with multiple apps, it says the ports are in use. I verified that no other app is using the ports. I checked in the CLI and it says containers is using the port. Very weird.

            Following tutorials and researching online had been helpful by my NAS uses QNAP’s QTS operating system. It locks you out of many basic functions. I can’t install apps outside of its App Store unless it’s in a docker container, for example.

            Many command line functions have also been removed so when I’m troubleshooting or looking for alternate fixes, I’m blocked out.

            • Gonzako@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              You nas doesn’t support docker compose? Its kind of the only reason why you’d want to have several processes on the same container.

              Ps.: can you ssh in?

              • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 day ago

                I can use docker compose. I need them on the same container so they can see the other apps exist and direct traffic there. Or that I as my understanding.

                I tried setting up Caddy on a separate container as Jellyfin but that didn’t work.

    • b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      It’s not easy trying to set up VPN or a reverse proxy, dynamic DNS and so on if you want secure access for more than yourself l, that is true. I hope they can figure out a way to make that process a lot easier.

      Actually, using an LLM to walk you through the process of setting up jellyfin inside a docker container (and setting up the arr stack) and all of that makes things a lot easier than trying to figure it all out on your own.

    • naticus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      That was a big reason I went with Emby. Not open source, but wasn’t necessary to me, and I wanted a cloud connect function that it handled well. And not all devices have a Jellyfin app that’s easy to install. My TV would require it to be rooted.