• stoy@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    14 hours ago

    And those who actually need them would be far better served by a VW Transporter with an aluminium bed.

    • Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 hours ago

      This is true, but there’s also a real lack of small pickups on the market. The fuckers just seem to be getting bigger and bigger. I used to have a Proton Jumbuck and it was really useful. Used it a lot for hauling wood and soil, it was small enough to get around and park easily in the city. I got rid of it eventually because it was so hard to find parts, shame, it was a handy little machine.

      • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It’s super frustrating because if you talk to anyone in a blue collar or rural area they all tell you they wish they still made small trucks. The manufacturers keep upping the size and cost adding shit nobody even asked for.

        • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          the Ford Maverick has been on the market for 5 years now.

          The F150 sold 150K units, the F-series sold 830K units, last year.

          Folks overwhelmingly choose larger cars even when smaller options are available.

          • aeiou_ckr@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            A front wheel drive unibody “truck” is a slap in the face to the small trucks of old. A dent in the bed and you either total it or replace a rear tire ever 6 months do to unfixable alignment issues.

            • TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              right, so you buy a f150 instead and bitch there are no small trucks.

              lose lose

              you can go buy a used small body on frame truck. just expect to pay 30-40K for one, because they are highly desirable.

              • aeiou_ckr@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                You’re right it’s a lose lose. Personally I’m in the camp of not wasting money on a poorly thought out truck (maverick) and just go rent one for the 1 time in 5 years I’ll need a bed. I had a big truck that was just enough to tow my RV (lived full time to save money for a home) and now that I don’t live in an RV full time that bitch was sold. Hello New world of tiny EV. :)

          • BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Whether rightly or wrongly, without a body on frame construction they were never really trying to sell that to traditional truck consumers.

        • bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The increased size is to flout emissions regulations. Costs (aside from greed) is due to increased requirements from the NHTSA.