Valve’s Steam Machine finally has a price: a whopping $1,049 for the 512GB configuration or $1,349 for the 2TB version. And those are without bundled controllers, which drive up the cost more.

The prices are so high in part because Valve isn’t subsidizing the hardware, and the company has already indicated that the component crisis forced it to reconsider its initial pricing plans. In an interview with the YouTube channel Gamers Nexus, Valve engineers discussed the reality of sourcing RAM in 2026, with take-it-or-leave-it prices as memory and other components remain in short supply, from only a few vendors like Samsung, Micron, and SK Hynix.

[…]

Valve, of course, isn’t the only company in a bind over memory shortages, as the crunch is forcing many hardware makers to make significant pricing changes. Even Apple CEO Tim Cook is warning of incoming price hikes for iPhones, Macs, and other devices. And the RAM crunch isn’t projected to get better anytime soon.

  • Senal@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    You’re also not mentioning that even the base ps5, which was released 6 years ago, performs better than a Steam Machine.

    is that based on the specs or some reviews somewhere ?


    edit: nvm, looked it up

    6700(ish) for ps5 OG

    vs

    7600 for steam machine

    pretty close , though ps5 probably wins due to very specific optimizations for games compiled for that platform.

    I’m seeing 7700xt for ps5 pro, not sure if that’s correct but it certainly beats a 7600.

    • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Early reviews are saying that the Steam Machine and PS5 perform similarly, with the PS5 being a smoother experience overall due to automatic framescaling. And that’s with something that’s 6+ years ago.

      • Senal@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        yeah there’s a bunch f performance bumps you can get with a fixed end platform and a whole company invested in making games that run on their platform perform well.

    • potustheplant@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Yeah, it’s close but the ps5 was released 6 years ago and it’s cheaper. The Steam Machine’s bang for buck is awful. It’s a pc with console limitations and a pc price.

        • potustheplant@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Hardware console limitations. Everything but the SSD and RAM is proprietary and you can’t upgrade it. Heck, it doesn’t even have an audio output. The I/O sucks hard.

          • PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah not having an audio port is a bit shit especially if this is suppose to be a plug n play type of deal. At least the consoles allow you to use the controllers for audio.

            • GalacticRobot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              That was a huge surprise the first time when I plugged in a PlayStation DualSense controller into my PC and the audio started coming out of the controller.

              • Senal@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                You can also plug headphone directly in to the controller (although you’ve probably seen that).

                nightmare for battery life if your headphones are above average impedance though.

                (or maybe it’s just my headphones, i’m not an audio snob, who knows?)