• Jax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I’m not sure that I have, actually — blanket generalizations are inherently deceitful.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I’m not sure that I have, actually — blanket generalizations are inherently deceitful.

        None of the definitions I can find for blanket generalizations require deceit.

        It’s simply a fallacy defined by inductive conclusions.

        You unintentionally and in good faith made a paradox under the misunderstanding that deceit was required.

        • Jax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          3 hours ago

          You don’t need to intend to be deceitful to be deceitful, just like you don’t need to intend to kill someone to kill them.

          The world is not sweeping absolutes. Painting it as such always obscures some truth, this post is no different.

          Edit: I’m just wrong here, I was misusing deceitful.

          • rumba@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            think anyone that makes blanket generalizations

            That’s a sweeping absolute, but this conversation is obviously going nowhere, have a good one friend.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              Edit: that wasn’t fair of me. Let me rethink this response.

              Edit2: I recognize the paradox here, I think I was using deceit incorrectly. I accept your responses, thanks for being cordial.

          • velma@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            It’s a good thing the person in the video specified she’s taking about men who have the audacity to judge women’s bodies and body hair publicly then.

            Since she’s talking about a specific subset of men, it’s not a blanket generalization.

            • Jax@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Yeah that context is important, the title is enough to make me write the whole thing off.

              I understand why clickbait strategies are common, I am just not the common denominator that they’re aimed at. Am I judging a book by its cover? Yes… but I’d also judge ‘Notes on How to Skin a Baby’ by its cover so… idk.

              • velma@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Comparing men that don’t like women’s natural bodies to murdering and skinning a baby sure is a choice you made.

                It’s ok if your kneejerk reaction was to be defensive. It’s also ok to re-examine the post and realize that just because you are a man doesn’t mean they’re talking about you.