• SteveGoob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Maybe cause its a separate issue? Look, yes it is costly to extract the resources for a battery, but once we have it, we have it for good. Batteries are incredibly recyclable at this point (90%+ recoverable, conservatively), and a new battery can be almost entirely created using previous batteries.

    This is in comparison to fossil fuels, which you get to burn exactly once, after which point you have to go extract more. The environmental costs of extracting oil (not even burning it) are well documented.

    Where a ICE car requires ongoing environmental devastation, an electric one does not inherently require it. As more of the materials for batteries enters circulation, there’s less need to go extract more, and as grids transition from fossil fuels to renewables the climate impact of charging can be lessened as well.

    Of course this isn’t to say that an electric car is the climate endgame. More walkable places, better public transit, better regulation of corporate polluters, etc. are the real meat and potatoes. But saying that EVs are just as bad as ICE cars is just not true.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s what those Facebook actually people fall back on so it isn’t a separate issue. It’s the issue being addressed.

      I’m aware of everything you said, I just find the article of low value for not being able to use as a retort to the people it claims to refute.

        • greybeard@feddit.online
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          Ok, but can you show me even one time those oil rigs have caused an environmental disaster? OK, but that was only once. OK, those 15 other times you linked. OK, but clearly they can’t be that bad, the hippies cleaned up the the birds and BP said they were sorry.