• HiTekRedNek@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Again, what gives anyone the right to determine what someone else puts on land they own?

    You seem to actively want people to have to obey someone else, and if that’s not sucking authoritarian cock I don’t know what is.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 minutes ago

      In case your attempt to start arguments is sparked from actual ignorance ….

      federal permitting and leasing for wind projects

      • many wind farms are not on owned property. In particular for offshore wind farms there is no land that can be owned. Many projects are in locations leased from the government
      • if turbines are above above a certain height, it affects airspace used for flying, you don’t own
      • even renewables can be bad for the environment. The trope about killing birds has some truth to it, and environmental review keeps it from happening
      • yes, renewables can affect your neighbors and they deserve some consideration
      • yes, it’s conceivable that a wind farm offshore or near a base or a border can have national security implications

      In a nation of laws, things like this are worth considering. However that is different than using them as cover for personal beliefs

    • AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You keep ascribing desires to me when I’ve done nothing more than explain the current situation… I have not stated a single opinion of mine in this thread thus far.