Over the years I’ve seen people in high profile roles resign in protest, but I’ve never understood it. I still don’t.
Is the whole point to bring attention to an issue and then what, hope for the best?
Is it not being able to look at yourself in the mirror and resigning with extra steps?
Is it a public dummy spit?
How does resigning actually fix something, or is that not a consideration?
As I said, I don’t understand.
Anyone?
Losing “don’t be evil” motto wasn’t already tossing out the moral compass?
Yep, but it takes some people a bit longer to realise than others…
Oh, and the attempt to lock down all Android apps is somehow moral? … But OK, better slightly good than totally evil. I appreciate small positive contributions.
He saw it today, yesterday would have been better, but he walked out.
We want more people to do this, he doesn’t need a cookie but he also doesn’t need a brick.
Or will replacements be worse when people who disagree might be able to steer a little
My friend just shared this with me today, rings true with this article
https://mrmarket.bearblog.dev/what-the-fuck-happened-to-nerds/
I feel like I’m going to be referencing this a lot
