• Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I mean that’s kinda like arguing white people weren’t responsible for apartheid in South-Africa, “just because they were the beneficiaries”.

    It wasn’t exactly black people drawing up those segregation laws, was it?

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      I mean that’s kinda like arguing white people weren’t responsible for apartheid in South-Africa

      Yes. Because that’s the correct take. Folks in Novosibirsk were not to blame for apartheid in South Africa. Most white south afrikaners were, and probably some of the natives played a role as well. The Dutch and the English were to blame to a large extent. But whites as an ethnic group, as a whole? That’s just silly.

      • Dasus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I didn’t say it was all white people everywhere, but it definitely wasn’t the black people doing apartheid either.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          But that’s the whole point of my comment. The part “secretly” in the phrase “jews secretly control Israel” means the only reasonable interpretation of the phrase is the antisemitic one.

          • Dasus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            But the people who control Israel are jews?

            I won’t argue there’s a bit of an antisemitic vibe to the way they put it, as “secretly”. But that secretly then also implies that most of Israelis don’t have control over what’s happening in their country. And most of them are Jewish as well so. Yeah. The implications are all over the place.