• shrek_is_love@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    92
    ·
    3 days ago

    he was unaware Mix could share patron data with neighboring businesses but did not see a problem with it. “I think it’s cute that they share it amongst other bars,” he wrote. “It’s like a little cybersecurity community.”

    • KingKong33@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      3 days ago

      Imagine being excited your personal data is being treated like the neighborhood fuckboy.

    • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      So, you have one bad interaction with some jerk, and then you get a life ban that propagates through the whole city?

      Seems rather shit. We might as well roll out a social credit scoring system. I bet you don’t even get three strikes.

      I would likely avoid any venue with a system like this anyway, so it won’t matter if I’m banned or not.

      • Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        For a different perspective over in the UK the vast majority of pubs were (are?) members of “Pub Watch.” Every so often the Police would turn up with a photo list for the premises of banned people in your area. It’s worth noting that everyone on the list had been criminally convicted of alcohol related violence and were subject to banning orders.