• Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    imagine someone actually assembling a nuclear or biological weapon based off LLM responses, like they can’t even get a simple fucking web search right most of the time, and you wanna put together deadly materials based on that shit??

    • Chais@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What’s the “worst” that could happen? It doesn’t work? Oh no, the biological/nuclear weapon doesn’t work!

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        it blows up in the makers face, it reacts uncleanly and leaves more nuclear waste than if it more completely went off, uhhh a bunch more ways it could fuck up

    • Anonymous111222@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Not to mention that (public) training data on this is scarce for obvious reasons, so an LLM will make things up even harder than it does with basic questions for which tons of training data exists.

      • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        It’s not that hard

        • a pipe
        • some explosive
        • a piece of critical material

        Cut the critical piece in half, put each half on one side of the pipe, add the explosives to one side, so that the halfes collide on triggering.
        Boom, you’ve built a small nuke.

        * the assembler will die a painful death after a while.