The Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 hours agoHe's an arboristlemmy.worldimagemessage-square58fedilinkarrow-up1275arrow-down13
arrow-up1272arrow-down1imageHe's an arboristlemmy.worldThe Picard Maneuver@lemmy.worldM to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 4 hours agomessage-square58fedilink
minus-squareFinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 hours agoOh you’re a skilled carpenter? How much wood have you cut in your time
minus-squareTess@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up26·3 hours agoHalf as much as they have measured, is my guess.
minus-squareFinjaminPoach@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 hour agoTHIS ia getting philosophical… i mean, first of all, things don’t need to be cut perfectly in half every time they’re cut. But then your answer is probably an estimate/approximation. HOWEVER… when you cut one piece of wood into two, is not 100% of the wood cut into? So either this carpenter measures 50% of his wood aimlessly, or you, sir, are a LIAR
minus-squaretryitout@infosec.publinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 minute agoI believe they were alluding to “measure twice, cut once”
Oh you’re a skilled carpenter? How much wood have you cut in your time
Half as much as they have measured, is my guess.
THIS ia getting philosophical… i mean, first of all, things don’t need to be cut perfectly in half every time they’re cut.
But then your answer is probably an estimate/approximation.
HOWEVER… when you cut one piece of wood into two, is not 100% of the wood cut into?
So either this carpenter measures 50% of his wood aimlessly, or you, sir, are a LIAR
I believe they were alluding to “measure twice, cut once”
Measure twice, cut once