• CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    There are many such areas, what I was trying to say was more that that is a solvable problem, if the government of the area was sufficiently motivated to solve it, rather than something like “we’re too big for anything but cars”, which is more of an excuse to not do any of that change to the infrastructure because it implies that nothing can reasonably be done and that cars are simply the natural way of things.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      37 minutes ago

      The problem is that making my area pedestrian friendly would involve doing a lot more than just adding sidewalks.

      For example, it would make much more sense to link all the cul de sacs with walking/biking paths. But to do that we’d need to bulldoze some houses, get easements from property owners, and then pay for the paths to be put in while hearing construction equipment for months.

      And our local government just doesn’t have the power to do that in a reasonable amount of time, or with any guarantees of it even surviving election season.

      And that’s not even talking about dealing with improving the main thoroughfare which is a state highway, meaning the local government has no say in how it’s built.