• Lunar@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    funny because i left duckduckgo since it’s littered with AI shit now.

    it’s just a metasearch engine for bing anyway and there are about a million of those.

  • nettie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Ddg:

    Ran https://voteyesornoai.com/ Where of 175k people, 90% said No AI

    Offers noai.duckduckgo.com, presumably to cater to this 90% who don’t want it.

    Has AI first features in main product. Does not advertise noai much.

    So…

    1. It’s primary product goes against it’s market research
    2. It’s pushing AI, not promoting the alternative
    3. People keep promoting ddg for (2) despite (1)

    Just seems weird.

    • fl42v@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Iirc, they explained it on techlore talks like “it"s X% of those who responded in $site, while many qactual users prefer or don’t oppose it”, or smth of that nature. Also, it appears far less than on google even with constant cookie clearing

    • Prathas@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Additionally, people told me that DDG is in bed with Microsoft. If that’s true, I guess Ecosia is hopefully better.

      • limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        DDG is not in bed with microsoft. DDG uses Bing search index to show its search results alongside wikipedia and others they can.

        Ecosia also uses Bing alongside its own search index. Except Mojeek, Qwant there are very few Independent search engines which don’t use Bing or Google as its search index.

  • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I switched because every time I tried to google something on my phone I got literally 10-15 captchas in a row and it was taking so long.

  • TDCN@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Been pretty happy with Qwant for the past month now. I do not really miss google. I set it as default on all my devises so I wouldn’t forget to use it. Now I prefer it. So nice to not having the entire screen filled with AI, sponsored irrelevant links and 99% SEO spam. I feel qwant has more nuanced results.

    • Prior_Industry@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Just “qwanted” a tech site name on mobile and the first two results were online gambling sites. Had to scroll to start seeing actual results. Not a great start.

  • dropdrip@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I would like to direct the reader to Yacy. It’s a free-software, self-hosted search-engine. Users have the option to peer with other users, creating a larger decentralised search engine.

    Build it. Use it. Promote it. Finance it. Bupf it, for short. Build the future you want or piss and moan endlessly.

    • firepenny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Cool! Would this be much different then say SearXNG? I know SearXNG relies on google, DDG etc to formulate its searches.

    • apex32@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Neat. Reminds me of bitmagnet, which crawls BitTorrent’s DHT to built a searchable index of torrents. It lacks a peer option though.

      I ran it for an hour and calculated that it would use over 1TB/month of bandwidth, which is too much for my data cap :(

      • rethnor@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I used an application like that once, peer to peer dht torrent search. I won’t go near that ever again, that was some nasty stuff I don’t want to get caught dead with.

    • Alas Poor Erinaceus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      On DDG is “Search Assist” the same thing as “Duck.ai?” Must confess that the former can be extremely useful sometimes, as long as I check its references.

      • trilobite@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        12 hours ago

        I think the most notable feature of ddg ai is that its not invasive, and as someone else has said here it can actually be useful. AI is like everything, you need to decide when it can actually add value. If i’m searching for some linux command, ai is brilliant. If i’m doing reasearch i may use ai asking for all references and then i go and check the references using search feature. Sometimes i just use search.

  • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Part of the problem is that most of these privacy-protecting search engines are just the big search engines re-packaged; DuckDuckGo is Bing, and Startpage is Google. SearchXNG is just an aggregator, and so is Kagi. What we really need are some alternative engines that function as well as Google used to. I would be willing to pay for that, as relying on ads clearly doesn’t work.

    • Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      DuckDuckGo=Bing is a misnomer - DDG uses a basket of search indexes excluding google, and I believe Bing’s percentage keeps shrinking (last I checked it was 15%)

      • limerod@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        I only know about Google and Bing and perhaps yandex who have their own Search Index. What others does DDG use and can you share the 15% figure you shared? I find it hard to believe DDG has already reduced its bing dependence to such a number.

      • TiredTiger@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Unfortunately, neither is anywhere close to how good Google used to be, unless they’ve improved in leaps and bounds since I last tried them. I just want to be able to use boolean search terms again, and the fact that most modern search engines don’t utilize them has me tearing my hair out.

        • baakjaer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I know Ecosia relies on Bing and Google but i have found their search results is the best of any of the “privacy” focused search engines

  • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    22 hours ago

    30% growth is great, but that still means google controls, like, 90% of search in absolute numbers?