• MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    I’ve never seen a roadmap

    Neither have I, sounds like a good project in itself if it doesn’t exist. ‘Drivers for xyz, reverse engineering something’ is part of the problem, phones usually (nearly always best I understand) have proprietary blobs of firmware to a greater or lesser degree and it’s a moving target different between manufacturers and most often models. Qualcomm modems are particularly egregious for patent reasons. US trade deal enforced global DMCA laws make reverse engineering legally tricky. Hence the desire for linux specific hardware platforms.

    • partofthevoice@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      US trade deal enforced global DMCA laws make reverse engineering legally tricky

      I love when the law concern itself with keeping the cat in the bag. The small anarchist in me wants to know what happens if someone reverse engineers something protected under DCMA, releases it, doesn’t claim credit. Now the software exists, so what does Uncle Sam do?

      • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        keeping the cat in the bag

        Just the neoliberal instinct to promote monopoly.

        what does Uncle Sam do?

        If you have adequate opsec, nothing ;}. At the moment, them pursuing it might provoke other governments to dump those laws, after all the deal was for tariff free trade, turn around is fair play. But manufacturers won’t want to take the legal risk until it shakes out.