The reason the FCC is only allowing the sale of state approved routers in the US?

    • Hiro8811@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      There’s no need, they can use triangulation since you’re almost always near your phone

    • fleck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I think the main advantage with the wifi-based approaches is that they are usually used in a relatively static/calm indoor environment with a stable channel response and your motions are disturbing that, compared to a quickly changing outdoor environment (e.g. a city) where it would be much harder to distinguish individuals. Also, you are typically closer to the access points, making the power/SNR higher. Regarding mobile communication though, the trend is towards higher frequencies and smaller cell sizes which also give greater spatial resolution (and higher power) and some funky near-field effects can be used to get beam forming on crack: https://arxiv.org/abs/2407.10147 So perhaps it could work even better, wouldn’t be surprised