• Rentlar@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I think they will become like IBM, once dominant, not dead today but pretty much irrelevant compared to what they once were.

    • lime!@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      9 hours ago

      ibm is still huge, but mostly because their shitty tactics in the past means that all their customers are completely dependent on them.

      seems like microsoft is taking inspiration.

      • bryndos@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        MS should be more vulnerable, due to everything but Excel being toilet blockages.

        TLDR; MS already got big by being like IBM, lots of dumb corpo procurement cash is already keeping them afloat for about as long as qwerty keyboards - because some people got really good at/dependent on excel.

        Their dominance of corpo-procurement (and using ‘security’ to block out alternative tooling) means that vast amounts of the corpo world is based on highly specialised and over-stretched excel.

        Even in databases, where my organisation (large public sector) should be having a genuine competition to administer postGRESQL for us or something, has been loss-led into into a big new ms fabric contract by them appearing to undercut the incumbent (Oracle - ok not hard to undercut), but not actuall . . . [rant deleted]

        However, crap MS is at software, they’re extremely good at getting dumb corpos to sign on the dotted line.
        (‘always has been’ meme). And many humans being forced to use the only tool available, have built vast intricate systems on the foundation of that excel, many of them masterworks of skill in the face of those constraints. Hopefully they don’t last as long as one of the old Egyptian dynasties.