• zurohki@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m anti-nuclear, but it’s because nuclear is so much slower to build and more expensive than solar or wind so the fossil fuel industry is pushing for nuclear to delay the transition away from fossil fuels and use up all the funding.

    If you have nuclear plants, you’ve paid to build them and you’re on the hook for decommissioning costs, sure, keep running them. Starting construction on new nuclear in 2026? That’s a terrible idea.

    You won’t be up and running before 2040 and you’re not going to be competitive against 2040’s renewables and batteries, never mind 2070’s.

    • Rakonat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      The 20+ year time to build is at best the direct result of lobbying and NIMBY and realistically just propoganda by antinuclear. The US mean for nuclear construction to production is 8 years. Japan has it down to under 5.

    • Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      China is building them in 5-6 years, the best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago and the second best time is now.

      • zurohki@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        We can’t build them in China, though. Only China can do that. My country doesn’t even have an existing nuclear industry.

        Sure we could start building reactors now, but we can get enough solar and battery storage through the night for less than nuclear would cost.

      • SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Props to China, but I know how long building projects take in my country. The plan will say 15 years and it will be done in 25 for 3x the price. And all that to have it produce a kWh for 0.50€. No, thanks.

        • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          So don’t build 1-off designs, look at the most expensive parts of plant construction, and lower those costs. China’s nuclear industry isn’t just some construction company that commissions bespoke parts for each nuclear plant, it extends to from heavy forging capacity shared with ship-building to colleges producing construction managers.