This is intrinsic to idealist thinking. Liberals literally think history is a struggle of ideas and the most correct ones will win if everyone just sits down and thinks about it.
Why sit down and think about it when you can just take the other guy’s stuff?
The liberal would probably say something like “the social contract prevents this kind of behavior, enlightenment thinking, etc.” The materialist would point out that behavior is exactly what society is organized around, because we have mutually exclusive class interests with the people doing the taking.
This is intrinsic to idealist thinking. Liberals literally think history is a struggle of ideas and the most correct ones will win if everyone just sits down and thinks about it.
They would! Unfortunately, that’s not how humans work. Why sit down and think about it when you can just take the other guy’s stuff?
And if you’re not good at thinking, how are you supposed to know when the guy you’re sitting down with isn’t just bullshitting you?
The liberal would probably say something like “the social contract prevents this kind of behavior, enlightenment thinking, etc.” The materialist would point out that behavior is exactly what society is organized around, because we have mutually exclusive class interests with the people doing the taking.
Yeah, sometimes you just gotta kill those who disagree.
Wait until you hear how the philosophy of the ruling class achieves and maintains dominance.
Hint: It’s not by calm, measured debate with the people whose oppression it justifies.
You’re clearly baiting something.
Haven’t you ever heard the saying that it’s difficult to get someone to understand something when their salary depends on them not understanding it?
This alone should tell you that you sometimes need more than just ideas. Like, sometimes you need to cut their salary.