• CptOblivius@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yes but at that level of energy no unit is useful for the average person to comprehend. I somewhat understand the usage here. If it was in joules very few people would be able comprehend.

    • moopet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      But then why pick 23, a number with two significant digits, to indicate scale? By this logic, 10 would be as effective at communication.

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      The 9 GW are already there if anyone needs a proper value, but without anything to compare it to, 9GW means nothing to most people. Hence the comparison.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        9 is not the total energy. The article says the total thermal load is 16. 9 for the electrical usage and another 7-8 in the form of cooling. It also says that’s the amount of 40,000 Walmart Supercenters…if you want another non standard American unit of measurement