• northendtrooper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 年前

    When will punishment stop being attached to a hard number and be a percentage of the company’s worth. Shits maddening.

    • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      2 年前

      While I’d love a percentage based fee, this is a damages suit, so it should be actual damages these people are owed, as determined by the court. A percentage just doesn’t make sense here unless punitive damages were also on the table.

      In principle I agree, though, breaking the law should not be an affordable “cost of doing business”.

    • FenrirIII@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      These companies shift gains and losses around so much that they would evade any punishment

      • paraphrand@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 年前

        “As you can see your honor, we actually lost 400 million last year. Negative profit. It looks like you actually owe us money when you calculate the proposed fine…”

      • muntedcrocodile@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 年前

        Surly u can make it the value of a percentage of shaires. The primary purpose of any company is the keep the shairholders happy either pay ur fines or fail ur primary purpose.

    • mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      2 年前

      Are you basically saying ‘When will corporations stop profit seeking?’

      Because the answer to that is ‘never by choice’.