• Seth Taylor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Yea, the intention’s good, but as a native Romanian speaker (same language family), I gotta say, that shit ugly. We need smth else. It’s super tricky with gendered languages

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        22 hours ago

        The @ is just a fancy a, so i don’t think it’s a good idea, generally i don’t think it’s a good idea to use any letter or symbol that doesn’t match at all our languages, it just feel to forced and most of those “solutions” include a group but exclude another big group: people with dyslexia, but also those with dysorthographia at times;

        My take is: we ditch one of the 2 genres and we have only one, or we add a thirdy one with a nicer sound than shit like -x, -ə or -u which is kinda hard tbh, maybe we can take a letter from some other alphabet?

        • lad@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Digching one of the genders looks better, but it will spark a huge war over which one to exclude (and I can totally understand that, at least from the side of women that are excluded by default in many languages)

          • Axolotl@feddit.it
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Yeah, that’s the main problem with that idea sadly, the third neutral gender is a good one too but it’s hard to pull off something decent…that’s the problem with forcing a change on a language .-.