I assume most people see that AI does more bad than good. There are legitimate use cases but it’s not possible to decouple them from the negative impacts. Power usage, resource shortages, water waste, environmental harms, disinformation, power concentration, IP theft and more are ll things that come even with the good uses of AI. And if it is so strongly coupled there is a two sides argument that evolves from that. Either you accept all the negatives for the positives (or don’t see the negatives as negative) or you find that the positives don’t outweigh the negatives. That often means you are either for or against AI.
I assume most people see that AI does more bad than good. There are legitimate use cases but it’s not possible to decouple them from the negative impacts. Power usage, resource shortages, water waste, environmental harms, disinformation, power concentration, IP theft and more are ll things that come even with the good uses of AI. And if it is so strongly coupled there is a two sides argument that evolves from that. Either you accept all the negatives for the positives (or don’t see the negatives as negative) or you find that the positives don’t outweigh the negatives. That often means you are either for or against AI.