• khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    LLM? No, continuously was a deliberate choice. I don’t see what’s wrong with it.

    I’m using the example of end to end encryption to show how online surveillance there is measurably worse.

    Your assertion was that online surveillance there is the same as elsewhere. That’s ridiculous. That’s the starting point and it’s what I’m sticking to. Lack of E2E is just such an obvious example of how it’s worse.

    You’re making assumptions about back doors in all Western tech. China has them.

    I can use any E2E encrypted platform I choose. You can’t use any. That’s worse.

    • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      You’re making assumptions about back doors in all Western tech.

      It’s not an assumption it’s proven real

      PRISM: Allowed the NSA to access data from major tech companies, including emails, documents, and photos.

      XKeyscore: Enables the NSA to analyze global internet data, making it easy to track individuals’ online activities.

      Tempora: The UK’s GCHQ tapped fiber-optic cables to collect vast amounts of data, sharing it with the NSA.

      Boundless Informant: A data visualization tool that documented the NSA’s global data collection effort.

      All revealed by snowden. If you think that they stopped any of this or this was all they were doing you are so incredibly naive it’s amazing you lived past 12.

      All I can say is cope.

      • architect@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Why are you talking to an llm? Don’t accuse people of bullshit like that then go on to prove you don’t even mean it by engaging.

        • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I have no issues with people using llms to help them format and formulate responses into coherent comments I just think it’s important to read over the output carefully hence I responded to the points while still pointing out it made some common llm errors that he must not have noticed. Why are you so aggressive?