I have a similar attitude to PRs on my projects even though I don’t use LLMs. Doing something myself is just simply faster that reviewing someone else’s code, it’s potential to be malicious, wasting time on the back and forth, contributors not following the project standards.
LLM’s may be a piece of the puzzle for this guy, but I have the same opinion without them.
Sounds like the PRs are too big or something. IDK. I’ve been doing a lot of code reviews the past 10 years. But those have all been within teams or with partners. Never someone random from the internet. The review sounds easier to me than communicating feedback and getting the submitter to fix their code and submit an acceptable version.
I have a similar attitude to PRs on my projects even though I don’t use LLMs. Doing something myself is just simply faster that reviewing someone else’s code, it’s potential to be malicious, wasting time on the back and forth, contributors not following the project standards.
LLM’s may be a piece of the puzzle for this guy, but I have the same opinion without them.
Sounds like the PRs are too big or something. IDK. I’ve been doing a lot of code reviews the past 10 years. But those have all been within teams or with partners. Never someone random from the internet. The review sounds easier to me than communicating feedback and getting the submitter to fix their code and submit an acceptable version.
Yeah, it is very different with a team member / known long time contributor. I am taking about random people opening a PR.