• null@piefed.nullspace.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    Now that’s what I’d expect from a Hasan fan, defending accusations of shocking his dog by deflecting to rant about Destiny.

    • |IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      22 hours ago

      And you’re exactly what I’d expect from a current-era Destiny fan :

      Ignoring every single one of the counter-arguments made - even when provided self-evident video supports the claim in order to sidestep the original discussion.

      I gave you 2 videos countering the dog shock meme shit - both of non-Hasan YouTubers with sizeable audiences and some measure of credibility, and you ignored them.

      Then you only glom onto the last part of my reply where I point out a few of the notable problems of streamer Destiny (who I’m guessing you’re a fan of - given the specific use of “up his ass” you’re perhaps unwittingly regurgitating and how you knew what “sex pest” referred to)… but again - at the same time - you ignore the videos provided that show Destiny saying the N-word and Destiny saying clearly on video that he is ok with 29 year olds having sex with 16 year olds as long as they’ve gone through puberty.

      You want to pretend that I’m “deflecting” so it allows you to avoid both my rebuttal as well as criticisms related to the streamer you seem most likely to be a fan of combined into a single reply.

        • |IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Care to share something more substantive than giggles to discredit a published writer for the Washington Post, NYT, The Daily Beast, or Business Insider?

          Or would that somehow count as me deflecting again?

          • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            something more substantive

            Yeah, let me link you to 40 minutes of glaze content. That’s how we provide evidence for things, right?

            • |IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              22 hours ago

              I mean, unless you’ve got something better - it’s that or self-smug laughing in comment form. Again, those two videos are not “glazing” Hasan from what I can tell.

              I get it you don’t like Taylor for some reason but what about the Leeja Miller video?

              You got a better way to convince anybody of anything other than self-righteous performative lols?

              • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                22 hours ago

                To answer your question, yes this is deflection.

                You linked to 40 minutes of content and went “see, proof”.

                Just wall after wall of text and cherry picked character references and accusations of people that have nothing to do with Hasan.

                All typical of a Hasan viewer though, so nice work.

                • |IlI|lIIl|IlIll|Il|IllI|@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  22 hours ago

                  OK, what other kind of proof can someone provide? 🤣 do I need a published peer reviewed paper or something or I mean - like what do you want?

                  • null@piefed.nullspace.lol
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    22 hours ago

                    So it’s either a published, peer reviewed paper, or this chaotic dump of slop?

                    Those are really the only 2 things you can imagine?